This tweet simply says 'WAF BYPASS??' without any specific details. It does not provide a payload, the type of vulnerability, or any vendor information about the WAF. Therefore, this message is too vague to analyze or create a blog post from. It appears to express frustration or excitement about bypassing a WAF, but lacks technical data to explain how or what was bypassed.
For more insights, check out the original tweet here: https://twitter.com/R3DD404/status/1955861891856634151. And don’t forget to follow @R3DD404 for more exciting updates in the world of cybersecurity.