The tweet mentioned does not provide specific details about the vulnerabilities or bypass techniques. It appears to criticize the claim of a new bypass and the effectiveness of the advice given. Without detailed information or a specific payload, it is challenging to analyze further. It is essential to provide precise details to validate and address any bypass claims effectively.
For more details, check out the original tweet here: https://twitter.com/MichaelHacks0n/status/1848064972535800058