This tweet discusses a SQL Injection bypass affecting multiple WAFs. The tweet highlights the difference between two SQL Injection payloads, one of which is successful in bypassing the WAF and can find vulnerabilities and read multiple tables, while the other one cannot. This bypass is significant as it allows for blind SQL Injection and exploitation of vulnerabilities. An analysis of the payloads and their impact on various WAF vendors would be valuable for understanding the effectiveness of WAF protection against SQL Injection attacks.
For more insights, check out the original tweet here: And don’t forget to follow @arminjourney for more exciting updates in the world of cybersecurity.