The tweet discusses price trends related to shipping routes rather than web application firewalls (WAFs). However, it metaphorically mentions a 'bypass' route, 'Khor Fakkan bypass,' which is a maritime route alternative to the Strait of Hormuz. The tweet notes that Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) achieve higher rates ($136k above trend) when using the Khor Fakkan bypass, whereas West Africa to UK Continent (WAF-UKC) Suezmax tankers trade below average at $87k. This indicates a premium for Gulf cargoes routed outside the Hormuz Strait. Although the term 'bypass' appears, it relates to shipping logistics, not to cybersecurity or WAF bypasses. Therefore, no technical WAF bypass details can be extracted. The mention of 'WAF-UKC' here is a shipping trade abbreviation, not a WAF vendor.
Original tweet: https://twitter.com/FootieGeekMatt/status/2050627198424363509